IMDB 7.7 | GIDONLINE 9.4 (THOUSANDS OF RATINGS, HUNDREDS COMMNTED)
I HAD A ROOMMATE ONCE, NOT A 100% KINDA GUY, WHO SAID HIS FAVOURITE MOVIE,
THE BEST TITLE HE KNEW, WAS “LUCKY NUMBER SLEVIN”.
“L.N.S.” IS BETTER THAN WIND RIVER. THAT’S FOR SURE.
THIS MOVIE IS A COMEDY. IT WAS BETTER THAN ONLY ONE MOVIE THE WEEK I WATCHED IT,
I SAW A SHITTY MOVIE MADE IN 1995 POST-USSR RUSSIA CALLED “WHAT FABOLOUS GAME”.
SCARLET WITCH, HAWKEYE AND THE PUNISHER STAR IN A MOVIE AIMED TO DRAW ATTENTION AT A SUBJECT STATED IN THE ENDING. A TEXT READS:
“Violence statistics are maintained on all female populations.
sensible statistics on women’s violence among Indian women are not kept”.
A BIT MORE ON THAT: THE WHOLE FILM THE FEMALE CHARACTERS ARE COMPARED.
THE FBI AGENT IS DRESSED IN THE DEAD GIRL’S CLOTHES. SHE FLASHES HER NICE ASS IN A BIKINI. THE MIXED GIRL WHO APPERENTLY DIED OF A LETHAL DRUG DOSE. THE MURDERED LADY WAS ATTACKED, RAPED AND LEFT TO DIE. HER MOTHER CUTS HERSELF (THAT’S THE MOST BIZZARE SCENE).
PEOPLE WHO SAY ITS CONTEMPORARY, IOMPORTANT, I PITY YOU.
THE MOVIE IS FINE FOR THE FIRST 15 MINUTES. BUT AFTER FINDING THE BODY…
LITERALLY EVERY 5 MINUTES THERE’S SOMETHING THAT RUINS THE LOGIC.
THEY VISIT THE PATHOLOGSIT.
“JACK, YOUV’E GOT FIVE MINUTES. MAKE IT QUICK”… WHY?
HE THEN EXPLAINS WHY HE CAN’T RULE THIS DEATH AS MURDER AND THE AGENT, IN TURN, EXPLAINS WHY THEN SHE CAN’T CALL BACKUP FOR THE INVESTIGATION. SHE’S VISUALLY UPSET. BUT WHAT KIND OF ARGUMENT CAN BE MADE AGAINST THE PATHOLOGIST?
SOME PEOPLE HAVE SAID THAT THE FILM DEALS WITH THE TOPIC OF BACKWRDS LAWS AND HOW HARD IT IS FOR A STRAIGHT-THINKING PERSON TO OPERATE IN THESE CONDITIONS OF BEAUREAUCRACY. AGAIN, PITY.
ELISABETH OLSEN IS THE WORST F.B.I. AGENT IN THE HISTORY OF CINEMA.
SHE DOES NOT COMMAND RESPECT, SHE HAS NO INSIGHT, SHE HAD NOT MADE ONE COHERENT DECISION IN THE ENTIRETY OF THE FILM. SHE IS NOT IN CONTROL OF ANYTHING.
- SHE ARRIVES FROM LAS-VEGAS. SHE HAS NO WINTER EQUIPMENT. IT IS NOT IN THE HIRED CAR. SO SHE’S COLD. DON’T THEY HAVE AN APARTMENT FOR AGENTS?
LOCAL HEADQUARTERS OR BRANCH? SHE COULD AT LEAST CALL IN ADVANCE FOR IT TO BE ARRANGED. BUT NO. AND THE THREE PEOPLE GREETING A FREEZING WOMAN JUST SPEND MINUTES TALKING WITH HER OUTSIDE, NOT IMMEDIATLY LETTING HER IN. - UPON ARRIVAL SHE DOESN’T ADRESS THOSE WHO WORK ON THE SCENE.
- SHE TALKS TO HAWKEYE. “-HAVE WE IDENTIFIED HER?” “-NO” “-THAT’S NATALIE” “-HAVE HER PARENTS REPORTED HER AS MISSING?” “-NO”. “-I RULE THIS AS A MURDER CASE”.
- TO THE SHERIFF “-CAN I HIRE HIM?” “-I’M NOT HIS MANAGER”.
- WHEN THEY COME TO A PLACE THEY’D LIKE TO INVESTIGATE,
THE SHERIFF INTENTIONALLY PROVOKES THE PERSON,
MAKING HIM ATTACK WITH PEPPERSPRAY. - HAWKEYE FLANGS THE RESIDENCE AS IF ANTICIPATING EVERYTHING.
AS IF THIS MOVIE WAS A PRECURSOR TO THE “BOURNE” SERIES WITH HIM STARRING.
HE THEN USES A SHOVEL TO HIT THE TWO MEN ESCAPING THE PREMISES, STOPPING THEM RIGHT THEN AND THERE IN THEIR TRACKS. WHY DOES HE DO THAT? FOR WHAT PURPOSE? WHAT AUTHORITY DOES HE HAVE? WHAT WOULD BECOME OF THIS? - DOWN YOU CAN SEE A “DID YOU KNOW” SHORT VIDEO PRAISING SOME MANEUVER SHE MADE. AS I’VE COMMENTED; THE WHOLE MOVIE SUCKS. IF YOU’VE FOUND ONE GOOD THING THATS NOTHING REALLY.
- OLSEN: “DON’T TALK TO THE SUSPECT”. HAWKEYE GETS PERMISSION FROM THE SHERIFF WHO LEFT THE CAR DOOR OPEN. HE SPEAKS TO THE DEAD GIRLS BROTHER. OLSEN LEARNS OF THAT. “-WHAT DID HE TELL YOU? ACTUALLY, I DON’T WANNA KNOW”.
- OLSEN WANTS TO CALL FOR BACKUP BUT THE SHERIFF MAKES HER CHANGE HER MIND.
- LATER A SCENE TAKES PLACE WHEN AN OFFICER REALIZES THEIR GROUP IS BEING SURROUNDED. OLSEN MAKES NO CONCLUSIONS, SHE DOESN’T CALL FOR BACKUP,
SHE DOESN’T QUIT FOR LATER TIME WHEN SHE DOES DEESCALATE THE SITUATION. - IMMEDATLY AFTER, WHEN APPROACHING A DOOR WHERE AN ARMED MAN IS BASED, SHE DOESN’T MOVE BACK DOWN THE STAIRS. SOMEHOW THE SHERIFF WARNES HER BUT SHE STILL GETS SHOT.
THE MOVIE IS SPECIFICALLY MADE BADLY. IT INTENTIONALLY PORTRAIS THE AGENT AS CLUMSY AND STUPID AND THE PATHFINDER AS RIGHTEOUS. PERHAPS BECAUSE OF THE GENOCIDE IT IS SO.
THE MOVIE CAN ONLY BE JUSTIFIED IF LOOKED AT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF HAWKEYE, THE PATHFINDER. HE COULD ESASILY BE THE KILLER ALL ALONG, HE HAS THE CAPACITY FOR IT.
SUCH A RUTHLESS MAN. HE WOULDN’T FLINTCH AT ANYTHING.
EVEN VOROSHILOV SHARPSHOOTER… IS BETTER.
BECAUSE THERE A PERSON WAS READY TO MAKE A WEIGHED DECISION –
IF HIS GRANDDAUGHTER WOULD POINT AT WHOSE WHO MAIMED HER – HE’D KILL THEM.
BUT HERE: F.B.I. WOULD NOT WAIT FOR LAB D.N.A. RESULTS (THEY DON’T HAVE TIME) FROM THE SPERM ON-SCENE.
OMG. JUST OPENED WIKIPEDIA.
Chris Plante of The Verge described it as “a thrilling, violent finale to the Hell or High Water and Sicario trilogy”.
In a High Country News article titled “Why do white writers keep making films about Indian Country?”, Native commentator Jason Asenap praises the film as “a thinking person’s thriller” full of complex characters, and describes the film’s focus on missing Native American women as “admirable.” He criticizes the film for perpetuating the “dying Indians” motif:
“at least in Hollywood, the Indians die. To this day, the Indians die, and not just physically, but culturally. Simpson and Sheridan are invested in making us see how America has screwed Native people, but to the point of rubbing it in our faces. Is it so terrible to live in one’s own homeland? It may be hard to get out, but it certainly feels condescending for a non-Native to write as much.”
The filmmakers were criticized for casting non-Native actors in some of the Native American roles. Kelsey Chow had been advertised as Eastern Band Cherokee, leading the Eastern Band Cherokee to issue a statement that she is neither an enrolled member nor descended from the tribe.
TO THIS I ONLY HAVE TO SAY: TWO THUMBS UP.
2022г. Выпал случай посмотреть. IMDB 7.7, GIDONLINE 9.4 Буду краток. Гооно адское. Ну просто словами не передать. Поверить невозможно. Начало только нормальное. А как труп найден то каждые 5 минут (фильм идёт – 01:40:00) идиотия ломает сценарий на корню. Олсен – худший агент ФБР за всю историю кинематографа. Если ДЮ Гоблин это рекламировал считай в 19г, то на этом карьере можно ставить точку и не вспоминать больше. И да, фильм снят чтобы привлечь внимание; “Статистики толковой по насилию женщин среди индианок не ведётся”. Для этого привлекли и алую ведьму, и соколиный глаз с Карателем. Но этот фильм сам ГОБЛИН должен был высмеевать не меньше “Наркокурьера”. А ещё в разборе “Ирландца” так о Скорцезе отзывался… Стыдно небось.
SHUT-EYE CINEMA 